While many women are devastated by Obama's selection of Joe Biden as a running mate, those concerned with achieving higher rates of female representation in elected offices should remember that the game is not over this election year. There numerous progressive women running for office all over the nation. Since an enormous portion of laws and policies that affect women are make outside of the Oval Office, don't write off 2008 as a big year for women just yet.
As Nelle from Refractive Thoughts pointed out in her comment to the news about Biden, less than 20% of Congress is female. As for who is leading our state governments, only eight women are currently governors. Tracey Sioux at BlogFabulous wrote:
America still ranks 71st in the world for female respresentation in our own government. That combines all levels from federal to local government. That’s pathetic.... I want women to be represented by women in Congress and in the House of Representatives and in the Judiciary and in my local government.
The 2008 election offers plenty of opportunities to make Sioux's wishes happen. According to Women's eNews, "149 women are candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives and eight women are running for the Senate." In this post, I'll look at progressive female candidates running for the House of Representatives who are participating in EMILY's List, an organization whose "members are dedicated to building a progressive America by electing pro-choice Democratic women to office." On Thursday, I'll write about the women running for the Senate and in gubernatorial races. (I hope that other bloggers will write about women running for office on the Republican ticket, but that is not my personal interest. Please note that I am not endorsing any of these candidates, either.)
There are 19 candidates on the EMILY's List list running for a seat in the House of Representatives. Four of the candidates [Melissa Bean (IL), Gabrielle Giffords (AZ), Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), and Carol Shea-Porter (NH)] are up for re-election. A female Republican from Ohio decided not to run for re-election, and the Democratic challenger (Mary Jo Killroy) is running against a male Republican, so a female position in the House would be lost if she loses. Two of the candidates [Betsy Markey (CO) and Annette Taddeo (FL)] are running for seats currently held by anti-choice women, so if they were elected, it would not change the net number of women in the House, but the ideological balance. The remaining 12 candidates [Judy Baker (MO), Kay Barnes (MO), Tracey Brooks (NY), Darcy Burner (AZ), Debbie Halvorson (IL), Christine Jennings (FL), Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ), Suzanne Kosmas (FL), Chellie Pingree (ME), Jeanne Shaheen (NH), Linda Stender (NJ), and Dina Titus (NV)] are running for seats held by men or against males for a vacant seat, so if they win, that would be a net gain of females serving in the House.
What are bloggers saying about some of these women? Let's take a look at three of EMILY's List's featured candidates:
Women have had the right to vote for less than 100 years, and while progress has been rapid when you think of it in that context, I agree with Nelle and Tracey that it's not good enough. Maybe there will not be a woman at the top of the executive branch this year, but by building up a political network, we make it more likely to happen in the future.
Suzanne also blogs about politics at The Political Voices of Women and about life in general at Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Other Rants. She is seeking submissions for a potential anthology about women's experiences with menstruation at Congratulations, You're a Woman Now!, to which she hopes women of all ages and backgrounds will contribute.
Comments
It would have been nice if
It would have been nice if we could have had a woman president sooner - but it will happen eventually. And Hillary has already helped to make that time come sooner rather than later.
last post:
2 Reasons Why Women Should Vote for Obama
That's how I feel, too
Rome wasn't built in a day. I get why some women are so anxious, though, but we won't see a female president until we build a pipeline of female candidates at all levels. For all the focus on sexism in the media, I think people really need to address the sexism in people's minds that also prevent experienced women from achieving leadership positions.
Suzanne Reisman, Contributing Editor - Feminism & Gender
Campaign for Unshaved Snatch (CUSS) & Oth
So true!
My sentiments completely. I am based in the UK and recently posted a comment on a UK newspaper site re: Hillary and the female presidency. Judging by the comments I received there is still a lot of sexism in people's minds - both men and women - and it is particularly bad here in the UK! It is almost like we are living back in the 60s.
Thank you!
DCSweetie (http://dcsweetie.blogspot.com/) This was a much needed dose of optimism among all the drama about Hillary. We often forget that it's not about electing any woman, but the right one, and you highlight some extremely capable women in this post!