Congratulations Phyllis and Del
by no_I_am_zoe

Can you imagine devoting more than 50 years building and nourishing a relationship and a home with the one person you love, your best friend, your partner in crime, your sidekick, the one person who truly knows you and who loves and accepts you "as is", the one who is the last person you want to see at night before you drift off to sleep and the first person you want to see when you wake, the one person who thinks you're beautiful even after time has changed you, the one person you turn to for comfort and the one you rush to to share joy, the one person you choose to love and hold ti

ght even when they push your every last button and drive you crazy because they are the one who makes it all worth it, the one person you can not imagine a life with out?

Can you imagine if you had that one person, but they were the one person you could not marry? Can you imagine if your love for that one person could be equated with mental illness? Can you imagine if you were, or could be, discriminated against for loving that one person? Can you imagine if you had worry that someone might act out against you in a violent way just for being with the person you love? What would you do if it were you? Would you sit back and accept it, or would you fight for change? Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin decided to lead the fight for change.

Phyllis and Del met and became friends in Seattle, 1949. They fell in love and began a romantic relationship in 1952. In 1953 they moved to San Fransisco and bought a home. In 1955, while seeking larger lesbian social group, Phyllis, Del and few friends started a lesbian organization called Daughters of Bilitis. Though beginning as a social group, Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) quickly became more of a political organization. Del became the DOB's president and Phyllis took on as editor of the their monthly magazine, The Ladder. They used much of their time and money to run DOB and The Ladder. By 1958 chapters of DOB began opening up in larger cities across the country. By the late 1960's the organization had grown, the focus of DOB began to shift away from Phyllis and Del's vision. The leadership changed, pushing Del and Phyllis out of the organization they started which ultimately lead to the collapse of DOB.

During the 1960's and early 1970's, Del and Phyllis also became active in San Francisco politics. As part of this work, they worked to end police harassment at gay bars. They helped to form the Alice B Toklas Memorial Democratic Club, which worked to help get lesbians elected to public office. They have both served on city commissions and task forces. They were also instrumental in getting the National Organization for Women to pass a resolution affirming that the oppression of lesbians is a feminist concern, and Del was the first out lesbian elected to NOW.

In 1972 Del and Phyllis published their book Lesbian/Woman. Their book Lesbian Love and Liberation was published in 1973. In 1976 Del published one of the earliest books on domestic violence, Battered Wives. In 1979 an affordable women's health clinic was opened in their names, Lyon-Martin Health Services, in San Fransisco.

On February 12, 2004, following Mayor Gavin Newsom's directive to grant marriage license to same-sex couples, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon were married by the San Francisco City Assessor. A photograph of their embrace at the ceremony catapulted them to national attention and changed the face of gay marriage for much of America. Sadly, their marriage was soon nullified by the Supreme Court of California on the grounds Mayor Newsom did not have the authority to issue the marriage licenses. Phyllis and Del then joined the law suit to challenge the constitutionality of the California law to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples. On May 15, 2008 they were victorious, the California Supreme court ruled it unconstitutional to ban same-sex marriage.

On June 16, 2008, at 5:01 pm, Mayor Gavin Newsom married Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon in a private ceremony. It fills my heart with great joy that these two women, who have spent their entire lives leading a tireless fight for fairness and equality, can finally stand up in front of friends, family and community and have their relationship looked upon with equal recognition. It is a time to celebrate and congratulate. It is a time to thank them for having the courage and the strength to be who they are and to stand up and take the lead. I know I don't have that kind of strength, I'm so appreciative that they do. I'm so happy they got enjoy the right to marry, something I imagine they never thought they'd see.

See what others have to say about these two wonderful women:
congratulations (again) phyllis & del, by Epiphenita
phyllis and del by THINGS according to me
Love is...by Jill on Feministe
Why this queer isn't celebrating, by Jack onFeministe
Love, Love, Love by Dorothy Surrenders
Who says lesbians and gays cannot form committed relationshipsby Paula the surfer mom at lesbiatopia

Image Credit: Woman Vision

Posted In

Comments

 

But here's the problem

Thanks for a quick run through the lives of these amazing women.

But, here's the problem...

can finally stand up in front of friends, family and community and have their relationship looked upon with equal recognition.

Martin and Lyons have always had their relationship looked upon with equal recognition by their family, friends and community. A marriage license did not change that.

Martin and Lyons marriage license did not change the fact that millions of Americans do not respect them or their relationship.

That piece of paper changes nothing - not for Lyons and Martin and not for the rest of us.

~Denise
BlogHer Community Manager

Flamingo House Happenings

 

Denise - you know I've been paying attention
to this.

And for what it's worth, although obviously I can't possibly understand what this feels like (not in this context anyway) my first reaction is that if it makes THEM feel better or more validated, maybe that's enough? Maybe nearing the end of their lives it makes them feel like what I'd call their activism combined with their love for each other is making SOME kind of stride?

I totally get what you're saying but for whatever reason it seems to matter an awful lot to the folks lining up to get married in California. Or maybe I'm just a terrible sap who can't see the forest for the trees. ;)

Laurie

 

That piece of paper could be the beginning of
a social change

Denise said:

That piece of paper changes nothing - not for Lyons and Martin and not for the rest of us. 

A piece of paper can be the start of a cultural change.

It is meaningless now, but I still think it's a step in the right direction. 

Vered DeLeeuw
www.momgrind.com

 

I think it's part of a

I think it's part of a long-term change, definitely. Bigots don't change their hearts overnight (or possibly ever) as the result of a piece of paper, but having the ability to marry means one fewer piece of information being transmitted by society that says people in same-sex relationships are inferior.

People like my grandfather are really unlikely to change their opinions. My son and his contemporaries, on the other hand, will be growing up in a changed cultural landscape.

 

I do not disagree, that

I do not disagree, that piece of paper changes noting, at least not in the imediate future.  But I do think that peice of paper holds hope for change. And I can tell you that thogh a peice of paper wouldn't change my committment to BP one bit, it would mean something me to have it. I can't quite verbalize what or why, but it would.

I imagine that peice of paper does hold some legal ivalue with regards inheritance and visitation and power of attorney and all that sort of thing. At least with respect to California State Law.  Which in my mind changes something.

 

Marriage Rights Should Be Federal, Not State

Next weekend my pals K&V are getting "married." I'm using quotes because what they're doing is having a wedding, but it doesn't change their civil rights any. We have domestic partnerships here in WA state, but what happens if my friends decide to move to Idaho or Montana? 

I'm delighted for those two lovely ladies, but also, super sad because state level rights aren't enough.  What happens to their rights should they cross state lines? And another friend of mine mentioned recently that when he tried to go through customs in San Francisco with his "husband"' - they were married in Vancouver but live in Seattle - that the officer would not let them go through together because "you're not a family." 

Full rights on a federal level. That's how it ought to be. 

 

Nerd's Eye View

 

And at the Federal level, I think it will
always...

be a "hands-off, it's your problem" issue, at least in this/my lifetime. That means it's likely to remain this crazy quilt of yeses, nos, retractions and fleeting decisions, because that's how it seems state government works. (And please someone correct me if I'm off-base...gently. ;))

Laurie

 

I couldn't agree more. 

I couldn't agree more.  Unfortunately, recognition at the federal level is going to have to happen in steps and will probably be a long drawn out legal battle.